Anton Matusevich vs Liam Hignett Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 04:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Matusevich vs L. Hignett

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Matusevich 1 - 0 Hignett
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anton Matusevich winning 2 and Liam Hignett winning 0. The last match between Anton Matusevich and Liam Hignett was at the M25 Glasgow, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Anton Matusevich getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matusevich | 1 |
| Hignett | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Glasgow(10-29-25)
A. Matusevich vs L. Hignett H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.07% (182-116) | Career Total W/L | 35.21% (25-46) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Matusevich vs L. Hignett Match Preview:
- In recent form, Anton Matusevich has shown a slight advantage in second serve points, winning 44.84% compared to Liam Hignett’s 43.48%.
- When considering return game stats, Matusevich has a minor edge in winning second serve points at 46.55%, while Hignett stands at 45.86%.
- Could the 26.59% first serve return success of Liam Hignett be decisive against Anton Matusevich’s 23.77%?
- Under pressure, Hignett has been better at saving breakpoints, achieving a 57.02% rate compared to Matusevich’s 53.55%.
- Looking at overall match performance over the last year, Matusevich has a higher win percentage of 56.41%, compared to Hignett's 47.37%.
- Both players excel on indoor hard courts with identical win rates of 66%, but Matusevich has a notably poor grass performance at 38%, whereas Hignett struggles on clay with no wins.
- Anton Matusevich has demonstrated strength in deciding sets, winning 64% in the last 12 months, whereas Liam Hignett is yet to win any deciding set.
- How does the quality of their opponents impact this prediction? Matusevich has faced players with an average rank of 375.31, while Hignett's opponents were ranked 178.21 on average, implying tougher competition but less success.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Considering the recent statistical performances, Anton Matusevich holds slight edges in both second serve points and return games. Despite Liam Hignett’s ability to save breakpoints better, Matusevich’s overall match performance over the past year showcases a higher success rate.
Both players share similar strengths on indoor hard courts, which should make their face-off on this surface competitive. However, Matusevich’s superior record in deciding sets could prove pivotal if the match becomes tightly contested.
The variation in the level of their opponents also suggests that while Hignett has faced tougher competition, he hasn’t been as successful. Therefore, based on these facts, Anton Matusevich is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Anton Matusevich vs Liam Hignett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Matusevich vs L. Hignett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:11 | Average Match Time | 1:11:11 |
| 50% (18/36) | 1st Serve % | 71% (45/63) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (34/63) | Return Points Win % | 22% (8/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Matusevich Recent Matches Played
L. Hignett Recent Matches Played

A. Matusevich vs L. Hignett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.07% (182/116) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.21% (25/46) |
| 58.66% (413/291) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.13% (63/98) |
| 52.48% (3593/3253) | Games Win/Loss | 46.30% (750/870) |
| 63.89% (46/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 55.00% (44/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 65.41% (87/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.24% (13/21) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1459 | Aces Total | 272 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 871 | Total Double Faults | 170 |
| 1:32:47 | Average Match Time | 1:21:49 |
| 485.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 189.17 |
| 58% (11698/20146) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2304/3925) |
| 73% (8532/11698) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1543/2304) |
| 51% (4284/8446) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (783/1621) |
| 40% (809/2017) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (119/303) |
| 39% (8234/20978) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1422/3926) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.78% (20/21) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.75% (160/91) | Futures W/L | 35.21% (25/46) |
| 61% (182/297) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (25/71) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (57/107) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (10/19) |
| 55% (58/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 83% (181/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (29/21) |
| 17% (181/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (29/8) |
| 26% (117/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (42/4) |